One Platform for AI Governance

The governance system of record for AI.

Strategy, risk, compliance, vendors and incidents declared once, connected on one shared record. Not stitched across spreadsheets.

Request a demo
ISO/IEC 42001EU AI ActNIST AI RMFDTA Policy (AU)APRA CPS 230 · 234Privacy Act 1988
Why AI governance stalls

AI is moving faster than the controls around it.

Governance built from disconnected documents can't keep pace or prove itself. Wahid AI closes the gap with one connected record.

01

Fragmented tooling

Strategy in slides, risk in a register, vendors in a questionnaire. Nothing reconciles.

02

Re-keyed judgement

The same use-case re-scored in every tool so the numbers disagree, and no one trusts them.

03

No line of sight

Boards can't trace a live AI system back to the objective it serves or the obligations it must meet.

04

Regulation, arriving now

ISO 42001, the EU AI Act and Australia's DTA policy all expect demonstrable, evidenced governance.

The guided tour

Five modules. One record. This is the real product.

Every screen below is Wahid AI as it runs today no mockups. Scroll the tour, then see it on your own use-cases.

01 · AI Use-Case & Inventory

Declare once. Everything follows.

Every AI initiative enters through a single intake dual-screened against the DTA impact tiers and the EU AI Act. One approval seeds a draft risk, opens the exact obligations, and creates the governed inventory record. In the same moment.

wahid · Intake
Declare once. Everything follows.
ZOOM IN
In the demothe live governance-gate preview the verdict updates as each intake field is completed.
02 · Risk, Controls & Incidents

Every number has one owner.

The flagship enterprise risk engine. Risk owns ratings and the acceptance chain everyone else reads them live. Change a residual rating and it updates everywhere it appears. A degraded control or a linked incident voids the acceptance automatically.

wahid · Risk
Every number has one owner.
ZOOM IN
In the demothe 5×5 appetite map beyond-appetite risks ringed red, each named with an owner and a next step.
03 · Compliance

What's required and is it met.

Obligations derive from intake answers never re-keyed. Each moves Open → In Progress → Evidenced → Met, with an owner and a citation. Blocking obligations gate an AI system's go-live until satisfied. Regimes switch on and off per tenant.

wahid · Compliance
What's required and is it met.
ZOOM IN
In the demo236 obligations across 14 regimes, three views of one worklist and a compliance gap raising a risk directly into the register.
04 · Third-Party Risk

The same rigour for someone else's model.

Vendors behind your AI are tiered on two axes how much you depend on them, against what they can touch. The tier drives due-diligence depth, contract protections and monitoring intensity. A sanctions, adverse-media or cyber signal fires a reassessment automatically.

wahid · Third-Party
The same rigour for someone else's model.
ZOOM IN
In the democoncentration and fourth-party exposure surfacing early and a failing vendor re-tiered without waiting for the annual cycle.
05 · AI Maturity & the Board

Benchmark it. Then prove it.

Governance maturity assessed across ten domains on a 0–4 scale, with ISO 42001 and EU AI Act add-ons rolled into one portfolio index, heatmap and remediation roadmap. Executives read six live lenses; every one exports to a board pack.

wahid · Maturity & Board
Benchmark it. Then prove it.
ZOOM IN
In the demoappetite breaches, expiring acceptances and blocking obligations surfacing automatically no manual exports, ever.

Plus four supporting modules AI Strategy · Training & Awareness · Governance Resources · User & Admin all reading the same record.

Evidence, not promises

Every claim comes with a receipt.

Six things we'll prove live, on a demo tenant screenshots attached.

AI inventory register
VIEW
“One intake drives everything.”

36 systems on one governed register each born with a review cadence and its obligations already open.

Board appetite map
VIEW
“Boards read it live.”

Six executive lenses over the live register which risks sit beyond appetite, who owns each, what happens next.

Incident register
VIEW
“An incident voids the acceptance.”

Incidents, near-misses and loss events link back to risks and automatically reopen anything that relied on them.

Third-party register
VIEW
“Vendors get the same rigour.”

Every third party tiered, assessed and monitored a red signal re-tiers the vendor without waiting a year.

Maturity domains ranked
VIEW
“Maturity, benchmarked.”

Ten domains scored 0–4 against a target, gap severity named the roadmap writes itself.

Blocking obligations
VIEW
“Hard gates that hold.”

A prohibited use-case can be explored but never finalised the block bites at submission.

One audit trail

Controls, incidents, monitoring and contracts all land on one append-only trail, inside one tenant boundary.

One owner per number

Strategy owns appetite. Risk owns ratings. Compliance owns obligations. Everyone else reads live judgement is never duplicated.

Your foundations

Fifteen self-service configuration areas scales, bands, appetite, authority versioned in-app. No five-figure invoice to change a scale.

Built for regulated Australia, by risk practitioners.

Wahid AI is part of the Effective RM family, alongside MaturityOne and RiskBridge. Framework claims say “aligns to” never “certified” unless it is.

ISO/IEC 42001EU AI ActNIST AI RMFDTA Policy (AU)APRA CPS 230APRA CPS 234Privacy Act 1988

You've seen the tour.
Now bring your use-cases.

A guided walkthrough on a live tenant, mapped to your regulatory obligations or a scoped pilot to prove the golden thread on your own data.